Skip to content

ESRS and CSRD

Consultancy

UK SRSThe UK Sustainability Reporting Standards, ESOS, SECR and TCFD, read against the published text.HUBUK SRS GuideAn independent reference guide to UK SRS, ESG, TCFD, SECR, ESOS and the global standards.YOU ARE HEREGlobal Reporting StandardsSustainability reporting standards worldwide: ISSB, the EU CSRD after Omnibus I, California SB 253 and SB 261, and UK SRS.UK SRS StandardsUK SRS S1 and S2 at the provision: reliefs, comply or explain, and the FCA statements.ESOS QuestESOS Phase 4 in depth: qualification, the audit, sign-off, action plans and penalties, read against the Regulations.SRS EngineeringThe data build behind a UK SRS report: metrics, owners, controls and timing.SRS ReportWhat a UK SRS report contains, how it is assembled, and how to read one.UK SRS ReportAnalysis and commentary: CDP, the DESNZ emission factors, SECR and ESOS, with every figure cited.UK SRS NewsThe cluster's news publication, and what a UK SRS report contains.UK SRS DeliveryTemplates, costs, ESOS delivery guides and readiness assessment.UK SRS FinanceFinanced emissions, PCAF and IFRS S1/S2 for banks, insurers and asset managers.SECRStreamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting: deadlines, thresholds, eligibility and guidance.Carbon CreditsCarbon credit ratings, risk analysis, valuation and market structure.Environmental RegimesThe eight UK environmental reporting regimes, their thresholds, deadlines and regulators.UK SRS ServicesThe services arm: ESOS, SECR, net zero and sustainability consultancy.

Standards and reporting

ESRS datapoints

An ESRS datapoint is a distinct piece of required information within a disclosure requirement, rather than a universal spreadsheet cell every company must complete.

What is an ESRS datapoint?

A disclosure requirement contains distinct datapoints, which can be narrative, semi-narrative or numerical information ESRS 1 paragraph 17 EFRAG explanatory note, paragraphs 19–32.

Information, not cellsRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Requirement

Identify the disclosure objective and applicable paragraph.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

A requirement to describe a method and a requirement to disclose a quantity are different types of information, even if a workbook presents each as one row.

The sustainability reporting standards homepage provides the wider framework map, while ESRS explains this particular family of standards.

The double-materiality assessment template provides a working register for separate impact and financial judgements.

The ESG data collection guide sets out a practical dictionary, ownership workflow and evidence register for reporting inputs.

Which datapoints resource should you use?

Choose the supporting resource that matches the reporting standard, because historical IG3 relates to the 2023 ESRS and the revised list is a separate 2026 draft resource EFRAG implementation guidance 2026 draft list release.

Version selection precedes the gap analysis.
ResourcePurposeLimit
2023 ESRS and original IG3Original standard and non-authoritative implementation support.Do not carry its references unchanged into revised reports.
Revised 2026 ESRSPublished requirements, entering force 10 November 2026 and applying from FY2027.Check specified FY2026 options and disclose the chosen version.
2026 draft datapoints listHuman-readable supporting list and version mapping.It is not a substitute for the standard or implementation guidance.
Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Keep the actual instrument, resource edition and source-read date in your project file, rather than labelling every spreadsheet simply ESRS Regulation 2026/1563, Articles 2–3.

How many ESRS datapoints must you report?

There is no universal company report count, because materiality, conditions, reliefs, entity-specific disclosures and disaggregation affect the information reported EFRAG explanatory note, paragraphs 67–71.

Explain the basisRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

List total

Check which standard, edition and counting method a number describes.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

EFRAG’s statistics distinguish general disclosure requirement references and technical basis-of-preparation information, so a headline count without its exclusions is misleading EFRAG explanatory note, paragraph 67.

Do not combine reduction percentages calculated on different bases or claim that a list total equals the number of facts every undertaking publishes.

Should you complete every workbook row?

No: the revised draft list expressly warns against using it as a checklist and requires judgement about materiality EFRAG explanatory note, paragraph 1.

The workbook supports a decision; it does not make the decision.
DecisionQuestionRecord
Topic selectionDoes the topic relate to material impacts, risks or opportunities?Link to the materiality conclusion.
Information selectionIs this particular information material?Record the reason for inclusion or omission.
Supplementary informationIs additional information presented under the permitted supplementary framework?Keep its purpose and presentation clear.
Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Revised ESRS 1 paragraph 24 says immaterial prescribed information shall not be disclosed, subject to the supplementary-information exception in section 8.2 ESRS 1 paragraphs 24–30.

Use the double materiality assessment guide before launching a department-wide data request.

What does a datapoint’s data type tell you?

EFRAG distinguishes narrative, semi-narrative and numerical information, so a blank text field is not equivalent to a numerical zero EFRAG explanatory note, paragraph 32.

Collect the right answerRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Narrative

Ask for an explanation with its boundary and assumptions.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

In a fictional Alder Components register, a transition-plan absence statement is a narrative disclosure rather than a failed attempt to enter zero tonnes.

For a quantity, the reviewer needs both the number and its context, because copying an unlabelled value into a report destroys the link with the source calculation.

How should zero, blank and not applicable differ?

Use explicit editorial workflow statuses so reviewers can distinguish an answer from an unresolved request, while applying the actual requirement and its conditions EFRAG explanatory note, paragraphs 1–4.

Suggested workflow labels, not official EFRAG workbook statuses.
StatusMeaning in this fictional workflowEvidence
ZeroA measured or calculated result is zero.Method and source records support the result.
Not applicableA stated condition does not apply.The condition and rationale are recorded.
Not materialThe information is excluded after judgement.Materiality reference and reviewer decision.
MissingThe requested information is unresolved.Named owner, reason and next action.
Read the detailed guidance and evidence

A blank cell is not evidence that a condition is absent, and a not-applicable label must not replace an uncomfortable missing-data problem.

Which context makes a metric reviewable?

A metric needs its measurement approach and relevant context alongside the value, rather than a disconnected numerical result ESRS 2 GDR-M paragraphs 48–49.

Keep the contextRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Boundary

Identify entities, activities and any relevant value-chain coverage.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Alder’s fictional electricity record links FY2027 consumption to meter batch M17 and factor register F4, with review sign-off and report location 7.3.

The example uses an invented register ID, ALD-E1-30-a-ii-LB, which is not an official EFRAG datapoint identifier.

Sustainability data management software should demonstrate that evidence path rather than merely exporting a populated spreadsheet.

How do conditions and reliefs affect a gap analysis?

A conditional requirement, a materiality judgement and an available transitional relief are different decisions and need different explanations ESRS 1 paragraphs 24–31 and 125–127.

Editorial gap-analysis design, not an automatic eligibility checker.
DecisionExampleReview control
ConditionA disclosure depends on the relevant activity or circumstance.Retain the precise condition and supporting facts.
MaterialityThe information is not material.Retain the information-materiality judgement.
Transitional reliefA qualifying reporter omits specified information for a permitted period.Identify the provision, year and surviving disclosure.
Read the detailed guidance and evidence

For E1 financial effects, the phase-in provisions preserve the specified asset-risk information in paragraphs 39(a)(b) and 40(a)(b), so an entire E1-11 worksheet cannot simply be marked deferred ESRS 1 paragraphs 125–127.

Why do policies and targets recur across topics?

The general disclosure requirements organise information about policies, actions, metrics and targets, with topical standards adding relevant specifications ESRS 2 GDR-P, GDR-A, GDR-M and GDR-T.

Map shared evidenceRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Policy scope

Identify which material matters and operations a policy covers.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

In the fictional register, one approved policy document can support several mapped disclosures without creating three inconsistent copies of the underlying policy.

Reusing evidence does not remove the need to answer the distinct information required for each material matter.

How does one requirement become several records?

Revised E1-8 requires both location-based and market-based Scope 2 information, illustrating why one broad requirement cannot be reduced to one universal number ESRS E1 paragraph 30(a)(ii).

Invented records illustrate evidence organisation and do not claim conformity.
Fictional recordEvidence linkReview question
Location-based Scope 2Meter batch M17 and factor register F4.Does the calculation follow the selected period and boundary?
Market-based Scope 2Same activity population and relevant contractual evidence.Do instruments meet the applicable quality criteria?
Inventory method narrativeBoundary decision and calculation-method note.Can a reader understand the resulting values?
Read the detailed guidance and evidence

The Scope 2 guide explains the two methods, while the original GHG Protocol sources support the underlying accounting approach Corporate Standard Scope 2 Guidance.

A Scope 3 inventory adds category-screening decisions rather than just another copy of the electricity worksheet Scope 3 Standard.

Is the XBRL taxonomy the datapoints list?

The draft list helps human users navigate requirements, while the draft XBRL taxonomy provides machine-readable concepts and additional technical attributes EFRAG taxonomy release, 17 September 2026.

Two representationsRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Human review

Use the workbook to navigate information and evidence.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

EFRAG states that digital tagging is not yet mandatory because the regulatory framework remains to be established by ESMA and the Commission EFRAG taxonomy release.

The ESRS digital taxonomy is also different from the EU environmental Taxonomy, and the voluntary standard’s Annex II value-chain cap is a separate instrument rather than another datapoints workbook Regulation 2026/1560, Article 3 and Annex II.

How should you migrate an older IG3 register?

Compare the original and revised requirements rather than assuming old and new workbook rows map one-to-one 2026 draft list release.

Suggested migration controls, not an official EFRAG procedure.
Migration stepCheckRetain
Freeze the earlier basisIdentify the standard and supporting workbook used.Historical references and report locations.
Map the new requirementReview changed wording, conditions and structure.New paragraph reference and mapping rationale.
Reassess evidenceCheck whether existing information answers the revised requirement.Revised owner, method and reviewer decision.
Read the detailed guidance and evidence

For example, revised E1-8 is the gross-emissions requirement, whereas the original ESRS located emissions in E1-6 Original ESRS E1 Revised E1 rendering.

The joint 2024 interoperability guidance can inform a dated comparison with ISSB disclosures but should not be treated as a fresh mapping of revised ESRS Joint interoperability guidance.

Reporting scope and the content standard are separate questions, so do not infer a company’s statutory obligations merely from possessing a workbook Directive 2026/470.

What should the final evidence handover include?

A useful handover identifies each selected disclosure, its reporting decision, source evidence, review status and publication location.

Follow one trailRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 04

Requirement

Instrument version, paragraph and information selected.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Alder’s fictional market-based record remains open until contractual evidence has been reviewed, even though the location-based calculation is ready.

The CSRD software guide and CSRD consultancy guide help turn this distinction into a demonstration and handover brief.

Completing a register helps organise reporting work but does not itself establish compliance or replace professional judgement EFRAG explanatory note, paragraph 1.

How can a team build a usable register?

This editorial nine-step sequence produces a reviewable evidence file rather than a claim that every workbook row must be completed.

  1. 101

    Fix the reporting basis

    Record the instrument, year and supporting resource edition.
  2. 202

    Retain materiality decisions

    Identify the matters and information selected for disclosure.
  3. 303

    Identify the information type

    Distinguish narrative, semi-narrative and numerical answers.
  4. 404

    Record conditions and reliefs

    Keep their provisions and rationale separate from missing data.
  5. 505

    Assign an evidence owner

    Name the function responsible for each source record.
  6. 606

    Preserve metric context

    Retain the unit, period, boundary and method.
  7. 707

    Map reused evidence

    Connect shared sources without duplicating inconsistent answers.
  8. 808

    Review the exceptions

    Resolve blanks, explain exclusions and check surviving disclosures.
  9. 909

    Trace the published result

    Record the final report location and retain the review history.

Frequently asked

Questions people ask

Is there one official number every company must report?

No: list totals do not equal a company’s reported facts, and materiality, conditions and disaggregation affect reporting.

Is IG3 the current revised-ESRS workbook?

The original IG3 relates to the 2023 ESRS, while EFRAG issued a separate draft list for revised ESRS in August 2026.

Is the 2026 datapoints list law?

No: EFRAG identifies it as non-authoritative supporting material that cannot replace the revised standards.

Does every datapoint need a number?

No: datapoints include narrative and semi-narrative information as well as numerical information.

Is ESRS XBRL tagging already mandatory?

EFRAG’s September 2026 release states that digital tagging is not yet mandatory and that the regulatory framework remains to be established.

Can a completed workbook prove compliance?

No: the draft list expressly must not be used as a checklist and must be used with judgement about materiality.

Sources

Primary sources

Primary provisions and official owner guidance checked on 26 October 2026; historical and draft resources are labelled in the guide.

Checked against 13 sources fromOfficial Journal of the European UnionEFRAG Knowledge HubGHG ProtocolIFRS Foundation and EFRAGEFRAGEFRAG Secretariat
  1. Official Journal of the European Union
    Revised ESRS: Regulation (EU) 2026/1563
  2. EFRAG Knowledge Hub
    Revised ESRS E1 delegated-act text
  3. GHG Protocol
    Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
  4. GHG Protocol
    Scope 2 Guidance
  5. GHG Protocol
    Corporate Value Chain Scope 3 Standard
  6. IFRS Foundation and EFRAG
    ESRS–ISSB interoperability guidance
  7. EFRAG
    Implementation guidance documents: 2023 ESRS
  8. Official Journal of the European Union
    Original ESRS: Regulation (EU) 2023/2772
  9. EFRAG Secretariat
    Revised ESRS draft datapoints and XBRL explanatory note
  10. EFRAG
    2026 draft datapoints list release
  11. EFRAG
    Revised ESRS draft XBRL taxonomy release
  12. Official Journal of the European Union
    Directive (EU) 2026/470
  13. Official Journal of the European Union
    Voluntary standard and value-chain cap: Regulation (EU) 2026/1560
Book a free consultation