Skip to content
UK SRSThe UK Sustainability Reporting Standards, ESOS, SECR and TCFD, read against the published text.HUBUK SRS GuideAn independent reference guide to UK SRS, ESG, TCFD, SECR, ESOS and the global standards.YOU ARE HEREGlobal Reporting StandardsSustainability reporting standards worldwide: ISSB, the EU CSRD after Omnibus I, California SB 253 and SB 261, and UK SRS.UK SRS StandardsUK SRS S1 and S2 at the provision: reliefs, comply or explain, and the FCA statements.ESOS QuestESOS Phase 4 in depth: qualification, the audit, sign-off, action plans and penalties, read against the Regulations.SRS EngineeringThe data build behind a UK SRS report: metrics, owners, controls and timing.SRS ReportWhat a UK SRS report contains, how it is assembled, and how to read one.UK SRS ReportAnalysis and commentary: CDP, the DESNZ emission factors, SECR and ESOS, with every figure cited.UK SRS NewsThe cluster's news publication, and what a UK SRS report contains.UK SRS DeliveryTemplates, costs, ESOS delivery guides and readiness assessment.UK SRS FinanceFinanced emissions, PCAF and IFRS S1/S2 for banks, insurers and asset managers.SECRStreamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting: deadlines, thresholds, eligibility and guidance.Carbon CreditsCarbon credit ratings, risk analysis, valuation and market structure.Environmental RegimesThe eight UK environmental reporting regimes, their thresholds, deadlines and regulators.UK SRS ServicesThe services arm: ESOS, SECR, net zero and sustainability consultancy.

Sustainability software · read against the rules, not the brochures

Sustainability software

Sustainability reporting software should connect source records to checked disclosures without losing the calculation history.

A useful sustainability software demonstration

What should a reporting platform demonstrate on your data?

Ask for a traceable journey from a source record to a disclosure, using your reporting framework and review needs as the acceptance criteria.

An editorial purchasing checklist, not a product test or ranking; disclosure criteria should trace to the applicable standard, including the source-linked UK SRS requirements.
Demonstration taskEvidence to requestRelated decision
Import and preserve source recordsA reconciliation from the original data to the platform’s stored quantities and units.Data-to-report pipeline
Reproduce a calculationMethod, boundary, factor version, assumptions and a result that can be independently recalculated.Metrics and reporting requirements
Map a disclosureThe applicable framework and version, the supporting data and the narrative or table exported.The reporting destination
Review and exportReview history, corrections, access controls and usable data and disclosure exports.Ownership and exit checks

Use the data-management guide for evidence collection and the disclosure-software guide for publication workflow.

The reporting year

From a meter reading to a filed disclosure, and every stop between

Sustainability reporting software should connect source records to checked disclosures without losing the calculation history.

  1. 1

    Collect

    Bring in invoices, meters, supplier responses and finance records.

  2. 2

    Calculate

    Retain factors, units, boundaries and versioned assumptions.

  3. 3

    Disclose

    Map the checked outputs to the relevant reporting requirements.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Sustainability reporting software is judged here the way an assurer or a regulator would judge its output: against the provisions of UK SRS S1 and S2, SECR, ESOS and the ESRS.

Since the FCA’s final rules of 30 September 2026, listed companies in scope report against UK SRS on a comply-or-explain basis for periods from 1 January 2027, and that is now the destination most UK buyers are planning for.

The page lists what a tool must hold, calculate and produce, with the provision for each, and then describes 17 vendors in alphabetical order from their own websites.

Stage 1 of 5
Energy and fuel records

SECR asks for an aggregate annual kWh figure: UK energy for unquoted companies and LLPs, with no territorial limit for quoted companies.

ESOS asks for total energy consumption over a twelve-month reference period that need not match the financial year.

SI 2008/410 Sch 7 ¶15(3A), ¶20D(3) · SI 2014/1643 reg 22(5), reg 25

What comes out

  • In the directors’ reportSECR statement

    Energy, emissions limbs, an intensity ratio, a methodology statement and comparatives for companies in scope.

    SI 2008/410 Sch 7 Parts 7 and 7A
  • Four-yearlyESOS assessment

    Phase 4 qualification date is 31 December 2026 and the compliance date is 5 December 2027.

    ESOS Regulations 2014 reg 15, Sch 1, reg 25 · SI 2026/701
  • Voluntary; comply or explain if listed in scopeUK SRS S1 and S2 report

    Listed companies in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22 report against UK SRS or explain why not, for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.

    FCA PS26/19 · UKLR 6.6.6R(7A), (7B), (8)
  • Only where the CSRD reaches youESRS report

    The revised ESRS apply to financial years from 1 January 2027, with three options for FY2026 and a statement of which version was used.

    Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563 Art 2(2)
  • Questionnaires from buyersCDP and customer requests

    In 2025 CDP’s supply-chain members requested environmental data from nearly 45,000 companies in 110 countries.

    CDP, Sustainable Supply Chains, 18 March 2026
1 / 5

Our diagram of the flow.

Each card names the instrument that creates the requirement; no product is implied.

The category

What sustainability software is, and where carbon software stops

A sustainability platform may handle narrative, materiality and controls as well as emissions calculations.

More than a carbon calculatorRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Carbon inventory

Calculate emissions and retain the underlying activity data.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Sustainability software is the family of tools a company uses to collect environmental, social and governance data and turn it into a published disclosure.

The narrow end is carbon accounting: activity data in, emission factors applied, a Scope 1, 2 and 3 inventory out.

That end is covered in its own right on the carbon management software page, which reads the same market against SECR and the GHG Protocol.

The broad end adds what a full disclosure standard asks for beyond emissions: the materiality judgement, governance and strategy narrative, targets, and the controls that let someone check the result.

A UK company reporting against UK SRS S1 needs the broad end, because S1 asks for sustainability-related risks and opportunities in general, not climate alone.

A company whose only duties are SECR and ESOS needs far less, and a sustainability platform bought for it is doing a small job with a large tool.

The standards themselves are explained on what UK SRS is and, for the international baseline, on IFRS S1 and S2.

Our description of the category. The rules column cites the instruments named on this page.
The jobCarbon accounting softwareSustainability reporting software
What it recordsEnergy and activity data, emission factors, the Scope 1, 2 and 3 inventoryAll of that, plus social and governance data, materiality records and narrative
Rules it servesSECR, ESOS, the GHG Protocol, the emissions metrics of UK SRS S2UK SRS S1 and S2, IFRS S1 and S2, the ESRS, GRI, CDP
MaterialityNot usually — the inventory is what it isFinancial materiality (UK SRS, IFRS) or double materiality (ESRS)
What an assurer testsA figure traced to source and factorThe figures, and for the CSRD the process that chose them

IFRS S2 metrics

Which software helps meet the IFRS sustainability metrics? Seven categories, one at a time

IFRS S2 asks for more than an emissions inventory, so assess where the remaining metric categories would live.

Seven metric categoriesRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Emissions

Absolute gross greenhouse gas emissions across the three scopes.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence
  1. Category (a)

    Greenhouse gas emissions

    Absolute gross Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions in tonnes of CO2e, which is the part every carbon tool covers.

    7 cross-industry metric categories in IFRS S2 ¶29

  2. Category (b)

    Climate-related transition risks

    The amount and percentage of assets or business activities vulnerable to transition risks, which needs an asset register and not only an emissions record.

  3. Category (c)

    Climate-related physical risks

    The amount and percentage of assets or business activities vulnerable to physical risks, which needs locations tied to hazard data.

  4. Category (d)

    Climate-related opportunities

    The amount and percentage of assets or business activities aligned with climate-related opportunities, which a platform holds only if you define the alignment.

  5. Category (e)

    Capital deployment

    The amount of capital expenditure, financing or investment deployed towards risks and opportunities, which sits in the finance system rather than the carbon tool.

  6. Category (f)

    Internal carbon prices

    Whether the entity applies an internal carbon price and at what price per tonne, a single input that scenario tools use.

  7. Category (g)

    Remuneration

    The percentage of executive management remuneration linked to climate-related considerations, a figure held by HR and not by any emissions product.

The categories are in IFRS S2 paragraph 29, and the UK edition is UK SRS S2.

Ask each vendor to show where categories (b) to (g) would be recorded, and write down whether you were shown the place, told about it or not yet asked.

The metrics are set out in full on IFRS S2 and UK SRS S2.

Four layers

What a platform has to do, one layer at a time

Check the collection, calculation, interpretation and publication layers separately instead of accepting a framework logo as proof.

Four jobs, one systemRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Records

Can you trace the original data, units and dates?

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

The first job is to hold the records in a form that can be traced: kilowatt-hours by fuel, journeys, purchases, supplier answers.

SECR wants an annual kWh total; ESOS wants twelve months that may not be your financial year (reg 22(5)).

Ask whether the system can hold two periods over the same meter data.

Sources: ESOS reg 22(5); DESNZ 2026 methodology paper; UK SRS S2; FCA PS26/19 Appendix 1; FRC ISSA (UK) 5000; IAASB ISSA 5000.

The words buyers use

Sustainability, reporting, disclosure, management: one category, several names

Sustainability software is the umbrella category, while reporting and carbon accounting describe particular jobs within it.

Names describe different layers

Carbon accounting

Calculates emissions from activity records and factors.

Reporting

Maps information to a disclosure framework.

Platform

May combine collection, calculation, narrative and controls.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Buyers search for the same tools under at least six names, and vendors use them loosely.

Sustainability software is the umbrella term for the whole family.

Sustainability reporting software means the reporting layer: the part that maps collected data to a framework and produces what is published.

Sustainability disclosure software describes the same layer from the output end, and in UK usage usually means the governance, strategy, risk management and metrics structure that IFRS S1 and S2 share with the old TCFD recommendations.

Sustainability management software leans the other way, towards running the programme behind the report: targets, supplier engagement, reduction projects.

ESG software and ESG platform are the investor-facing names for the same tools, taken from the environmental, social and governance shorthand.

Sustainability data management software is what a vendor calls its product when the selling point is the collection and control of data rather than the report.

None of these names is defined in any instrument, so none of them tells you what a product does.

What tells you is whether it can produce the specific outputs the rules you report under require, which is the rest of this page.

ESG platforms against carbon accounting software

An ESG platform manages the full environmental, social and governance programme; carbon accounting software measures emissions.

The line is one of scope, and it matters because the ESG end is where materiality lives: UK SRS uses financial materiality, while the European Sustainability Reporting Standards use double materiality.

A tool built around one materiality model does not automatically serve the other.

The difference is set out on single and double materiality, and the wider UK duties on the ESG reporting requirements UK page.

Scope

Carbon accounting software against a reporting platform: what stops where

Buy for the reporting work you actually need, rather than assuming every organisation needs a full ESG suite.

Explore carbon management software

Choose the needed layers

Carbon tool

Fits an inventory-led requirement with a clear boundary.

Reporting platform

Adds narrative, framework mapping and review controls.

Combined workflow

May use separate tools with a documented transfer between them.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence
Stops at the inventory

Carbon accounting software measures emissions and leaves the statement to you.

A full reporting platform

A reporting platform adds the governance, materiality and disclosure layers and the audit trail.

The four layers are described above; no product is implied.

A company whose only duties are SECR and ESOS needs an energy and emissions record, and one reporting under UK SRS S1 and S2 also needs the narrative and materiality layers.

The wider duties are on ESG reporting requirements in the UK.

The destination

What UK reporters must produce, 2026 to 2028

The required reporting output should determine which software layers are needed.

Start with the published output

SECR

Produce the prescribed energy and carbon information.

UK SRS

Connect climate figures with strategy, risk and financial information.

EU route

Add the relevant ESRS requirements where the CSRD reaches the organisation.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

For a UK company the destination has three layers, and software is bought to serve all of them at once.

The first is SECR, in force since 2019: quoted companies, large unquoted companies and large LLPs report energy, emissions and an intensity ratio in the directors’ report under Schedule 7 to SI 2008/410.

DESNZ’s own evaluation of SECR put the population at about 19,900 organisations.

The second is ESOS, a four-yearly energy assessment whose Phase 4 qualification date is 31 December 2026 and whose compliance date is 5 December 2027; the figures are on ESOS Phase 4.

The third is UK SRS, which any entity may use voluntarily and which listed companies in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22 must report against or explain why not, for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.

Two reliefs sit inside the FCA rules: one year’s non-disclosure of Scope 3 under UK SRS S2, and two years’ non-disclosure of non-climate matters under UK SRS S1, each used by saying so (PS26/19 ¶¶3.14, 3.20).

The FCA says the new rules replace the TCFD-aligned disclosures (PS26/19 ¶1.10), so a tool sold as “TCFD reporting software” for a UK listed company is now really being asked to produce UK SRS output.

For UK groups with EU operations there is a fourth layer, the CSRD, taken up on the CSRD reporting software page.

The dates are set out in full on the UK SRS timeline, and what the FCA position means for each listing category on the UK SRS deadline.

Two strands are still moving, and neither is law: DESNZ’s 2026 review of SECR recommends keeping it with amendments and plans a consultation on streamlining that had not opened when this page was checked, and the GHG Protocol and ISO are consolidating their corporate standards, with a consultation draft estimated for Q2 2027 and the standard for Q4 2028 (plan v2.0, §9, subject to change).

Sources: DBT; DESNZ factors 2026; European Commission, 3 July 2026; FCA PS26/19; SI 2026/701; GOV.UK ESOS Phase 4; GHG Protocol update, 29 July 2026.

  1. 25 Feb 2026
    UK SRS S1 and S2 published
    By the Department for Business and Trade, for voluntary use.
  2. 26 May 2026
    DESNZ publishes the SECR review
    Recommends retaining SECR with amendments; a consultation on streamlining is planned, nothing decided.
  3. 11 Jun 2026
    2026 conversion factors
    DESNZ publishes the set for activity data falling mostly in 2026.
  4. 3 Jul 2026
    Revised ESRS adopted
    Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563; in force 10 November 2026.
  5. 30 Sep 2026
    FCA PS26/19
    Final rules: comply or explain across UK SRS for listed companies in scope.
  6. 15 Dec 2026
    ISSA (UK) 5000 effective
    For periods beginning on or after this date, where a provider applies it.
  7. 31 Dec 2026
    ESOS Phase 4 qualification date
    Compliance date 5 December 2027.
  8. 1 Jan 2027
    FCA rules apply
    Accounting periods beginning on or after this date; revised ESRS apply to financial years from the same date.
  9. Q2 2027 (estimated)
    GHG Protocol and ISO consolidated draft
    Out for public consultation, per the plan of 29 July 2026; subject to change.
  10. 2028
    First UK SRS reports under the FCA rules
    And first reports under the revised ESRS.
  11. Q4 2028 (estimated)
    Revised consolidated standard
    The plan’s estimate for the standard; guidance follows later.

Start here

Which duties reach you, and so which kind of tool you are buying

A software selection should follow the organisation's actual reporting scope rather than a vendor's list of framework logos.

  1. 1

    Legal form

    Identify the entity and group.

  2. 2

    Scope

    Run the applicable reporting tests.

  3. 3

    Requirements

    Translate the resulting duties into demonstration requests.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence
Which duties reach your company
Are you a listed company within UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 or 22?
The FCA’s final rules (PS26/19) cover these categories only.

Smaller companies

Sustainability software for a small business: what you need first

A smaller business should identify its actual duties and customer needs before buying a complex reporting platform.

A proportionate first system

Current duties

Check whether any statutory scope test is met.

Customer requests

Clarify what information the customer needs and why.

Repeatability

Choose a workflow that retains usable evidence.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Adjacent tools

Supplier data, social audits and life cycle assessment: three neighbours of the category

Life cycle assessment addresses a product or service, while corporate inventory methods address an organisation.

Product and corporate methods differ

Product

Define the product system and functional unit.

Corporate

Define organisational and operational boundaries.

Connection

Explain how product data contributes to value-chain estimates.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

The requirements

What a tool must hold, calculate and produce, provision by provision

Ask vendors to demonstrate the functions needed for the organisation's actual reporting route.

  1. 1

    Data

    Show records, reporting periods and ownership.

  2. 2

    Method

    Show boundaries, factors and calculation history.

  3. 3

    Publication

    Show review, mappings and an exportable evidence pack.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence
Bible entries: SECR [10], [314], [315], [346]–[348]; factors [326], [398]; ESOS [382]; UK SRS S2 [4], [280], [325], [399]; FCA [765], [767]; assurance [388]; ESRS [181], [186], [327], [675].
RegimeWhat the system must doProvisionAsk the vendor to show
SECRAn aggregate annual energy figure in kWh — UK energy for unquoted companies and LLPs; no territorial limit for quoted companies.SI 2008/410 Sch 7 ¶15(3A); ¶20D(3)Show the year’s kWh total and the lines it is built from, split by fuel.
SECREmissions from the combustion of gas, the consumption of fuel for transport and purchased electricity (unquoted); from the combustion of fuel, the operation of any facility and purchased electricity, heat, steam or cooling (quoted).Sch 7 ¶15(2)–(3); ¶20D(1)–(2)Map each calculation line to the statutory limb it reports under.
SECRFor a quoted company, the proportion of reported emissions and energy that relates to the United Kingdom and offshore area.Sch 7 ¶15(3B)–(3C)Show a global total split into UK-and-offshore and elsewhere.
SECRAt least one ratio expressing annual emissions against a quantifiable factor the company chooses. It is an emissions ratio; no denominator is prescribed.Sch 7 ¶17; ¶20GLet us set our own denominator, and show the ratio uses emissions, not energy.
SECRA statement of the methodologies used to calculate the energy and emissions figures.Sch 7 ¶16; ¶20FExport the methodology statement, naming the factor set and approach used.
SECRPrior-year figures after the first year — for quoted companies both the emissions and ratio (¶18) and the energy and efficiency limbs (¶18A).Sch 7 ¶18, ¶18A; ¶20HReproduce last year’s energy and emissions beside this year’s from stored data.
SECRWhere energy-efficiency measures were taken in the year, a description of the principal measures.Sch 7 ¶15(3D); ¶20D(4)Keep a log of measures that feeds the narrative.
SECRThe 40,000 kWh relief is tested on all energy consumed, not only the fuels reported, and applies only if the report says the information is omitted for that reason.Sch 7 ¶15(5)(a); ¶20D(7)(a); ¶20, ¶20KShow the relief test running on every energy product, and the statement it produces.
DESNZ factorsEach year’s set is for activity data falling entirely or mostly within that year — not the filing year and not the publication year.DESNZ 2026 Methodology Paper ¶1.10Show which factor set was applied to each activity line, and the rule for periods spanning two years.
DESNZ factorsThe 2026 electricity factor was calculated by a new method with a one-year data lag, so a 2025-to-2026 fall is not one year of grid change.Methodology Paper ¶1.13; 2026 major changes reportDoes the year-on-year view annotate the 2026 methodology change?
ESOSTotal energy consumption over a 12-month reference period that can differ from the financial year.SI 2014/1643 reg 22(5); reg 25Set a reference period that is not our financial year and recalculate.
ESOSAreas of significant energy consumption: assets and activities together accounting for not less than 95% of total consumption, measured in energy units or by spend.SI 2014/1643 reg 25(2)Show the coverage percentage and which sites or activities make it up.
ESOSAn energy intensity ratio for each organisational purpose — transport, industrial process, buildings and any other purpose.SI 2014/1643 reg 2(1); reg 25C(1)Tag every energy line to one of the four purposes and produce four ratios.
UK SRS S2Greenhouse gas emissions measured in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (2004), unless a jurisdictional authority or exchange requires another method.UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(ii)Show the measurement approach and organisational boundary the engine applies.
UK SRS S2Absolute gross emissions for Scopes 1, 2 and 3. Carbon credits are never netted off the inventory.UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(i)Show that credits sit in a separate ledger and never reduce the reported total.
UK SRS S2Scope 2 on a location-based approach, with information on contractual instruments only where they exist and inform users. A market-based figure is permitted, not required.UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(v); ¶¶B30–B31Default Scope 2 to location-based, with market-based alongside if we choose.
UK SRS S2All 15 Scope 3 categories considered and the categories included disclosed, whatever the measurement method. Category 15 may be limited to financed emissions.UK SRS S2 ¶¶B32–B33; ¶29AShow a category-by-category record of what is included and why the rest is not.
FCA listing rulesWhere UK SRS S2 disclosures are not made, or made in part, a statement of the unmet requirements, the reasons, and the steps planned.UKLR 6.6.6R(7A)(b), from 1 January 2027Keep a gap register that exports into that three-part statement.
FCA listing rulesA company using the one-year Scope 3 relief, or the two-year relief for S1 non-climate matters, states that it is doing so; no further explanation is needed during the relief.PS26/19 ¶¶3.14, 3.20; UKLR TP 16Record a relief statement rather than leaving a blank field.
FCA listing rulesWhere the disclosures can be found, which may be by cross-reference under UK SRS S1 ¶¶B45–B47, and whether a climate transition plan is published and where.UKLR 6.6.6R(8)(c), (e)Produce the location and transition-plan statements with the cross-references.
AssuranceListed companies state whether third-party assurance was obtained and, if so, the provider, which disclosures, the level and the standards used. Assurance itself is not required.UKLR 6.6.6R(8)(d)Record the engagement scope so the statement can be produced from the system.
AssuranceISSA (UK) 5000 applies to engagements for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2026, for providers who choose it. No UK entity is required to obtain sustainability assurance.ISSA (UK) 5000 ¶15 (FRC, issued 12 November 2025)Can a sample figure be traced from source document to reported total without leaving the system?
CSRD / ESRSFor a financial year starting in 2026, one of three versions of the ESRS may be applied — and the report must state which.Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563 Art 2(1)–(2)Show the field recording which ESRS version each disclosure was prepared under.
CSRD / ESRSInformation prescribed by a disclosure requirement or datapoint shall not be disclosed if it is not material.ESRS 1 ¶24 (revised ESRS)Can a prescribed datapoint be omitted, with the reason recorded?
CSRD / ESRSGross Scope 2 emissions on both the location-based and the market-based method — unlike UK SRS S2, which requires only the first.ESRS E1-8 (revised ESRS)Produce both Scope 2 figures from one dataset for a group reporting under both regimes.
CSRD / ESRSA supplier with 1,000 employees or fewer may decline requests beyond the voluntary standard’s Annex II datapoints, from financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027.Dir 2013/34/EU Art 19a(3); DR (EU) 2026/1560 Art 3Can supplier questionnaires be capped at the Annex II datapoints for protected suppliers?

Filter the register · 14 of 26 requirements

The regimes you report under
  1. SECR · DataAn aggregate annual energy figure in kWh — UK energy for unquoted companies and LLPs; no territorial limit for quoted companies.Ask: Show the year’s kWh total and the lines it is built from, split by fuel.SI 2008/410 Sch 7 ¶15(3A); ¶20D(3) ↗
  2. SECR · CalculationEmissions from the combustion of gas, the consumption of fuel for transport and purchased electricity (unquoted); from the combustion of fuel, the operation of any facility and purchased electricity, heat, steam or cooling (quoted).Ask: Map each calculation line to the statutory limb it reports under.Sch 7 ¶15(2)–(3); ¶20D(1)–(2) ↗
  3. SECR · DisclosureFor a quoted company, the proportion of reported emissions and energy that relates to the United Kingdom and offshore area.Ask: Show a global total split into UK-and-offshore and elsewhere.Sch 7 ¶15(3B)–(3C) ↗
  4. SECR · DisclosureAt least one ratio expressing annual emissions against a quantifiable factor the company chooses. It is an emissions ratio; no denominator is prescribed.Ask: Let us set our own denominator, and show the ratio uses emissions, not energy.Sch 7 ¶17; ¶20G ↗
  5. SECR · DisclosureA statement of the methodologies used to calculate the energy and emissions figures.Ask: Export the methodology statement, naming the factor set and approach used.Sch 7 ¶16; ¶20F ↗
  6. SECR · DisclosurePrior-year figures after the first year — for quoted companies both the emissions and ratio (¶18) and the energy and efficiency limbs (¶18A).Ask: Reproduce last year’s energy and emissions beside this year’s from stored data.Sch 7 ¶18, ¶18A; ¶20H ↗
  7. SECR · DisclosureWhere energy-efficiency measures were taken in the year, a description of the principal measures.Ask: Keep a log of measures that feeds the narrative.Sch 7 ¶15(3D); ¶20D(4) ↗
  8. SECR · CalculationThe 40,000 kWh relief is tested on all energy consumed, not only the fuels reported, and applies only if the report says the information is omitted for that reason.Ask: Show the relief test running on every energy product, and the statement it produces.Sch 7 ¶15(5)(a); ¶20D(7)(a); ¶20, ¶20K ↗
  9. Conversion factors · CalculationEach year’s set is for activity data falling entirely or mostly within that year — not the filing year and not the publication year.Ask: Show which factor set was applied to each activity line, and the rule for periods spanning two years.DESNZ 2026 Methodology Paper ¶1.10 ↗
  10. Conversion factors · EvidenceThe 2026 electricity factor was calculated by a new method with a one-year data lag, so a 2025-to-2026 fall is not one year of grid change.Ask: Does the year-on-year view annotate the 2026 methodology change?Methodology Paper ¶1.13; 2026 major changes report ↗
  11. UK SRS S2 · CalculationGreenhouse gas emissions measured in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (2004), unless a jurisdictional authority or exchange requires another method.Ask: Show the measurement approach and organisational boundary the engine applies.UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(ii) ↗
  12. UK SRS S2 · DisclosureAbsolute gross emissions for Scopes 1, 2 and 3. Carbon credits are never netted off the inventory.Ask: Show that credits sit in a separate ledger and never reduce the reported total.UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(i) ↗
  13. UK SRS S2 · DisclosureScope 2 on a location-based approach, with information on contractual instruments only where they exist and inform users. A market-based figure is permitted, not required.Ask: Default Scope 2 to location-based, with market-based alongside if we choose.UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(v); ¶¶B30–B31 ↗
  14. UK SRS S2 · DisclosureAll 15 Scope 3 categories considered and the categories included disclosed, whatever the measurement method. Category 15 may be limited to financed emissions.Ask: Show a category-by-category record of what is included and why the rest is not.UK SRS S2 ¶¶B32–B33; ¶29A ↗

The requirement is the instrument’s; the question is ours.

Nothing you select leaves your browser.

Filter the register to the regimes you actually report under.

An unquoted company with no EU exposure and no listing has SECR, the conversion factors and, if it is large enough, ESOS.

A listed company adds UK SRS S2 and the FCA statements, and very probably UK SRS S1.

A UK group with a large EU subsidiary may add the ESRS on top.

Three rows catch most buyers out: location-based Scope 2 is the UK SRS S2 requirement and market-based is optional (¶29(a)(v)); the SECR ratio is an emissions ratio with a denominator the company chooses (Sch 7 ¶20G); and ESOS’s twelve-month reference period need not be the financial year (reg 22(5)).

For SECR in depth, the thresholds and the three populations are on SECR thresholds; for Scope 3, the fifteen categories are on Scope 3 under UK SRS.

Sources: SI 2008/410 Sch 7; ESOS reg 25; UK SRS S2; FCA PS26/19; ISSA (UK) 5000; DR (EU) 2026/1563.

The buying argument

One dataset, several disclosures: where the regimes agree and where they part

The same activity data can support several regimes, but their boundaries, periods and disclosure rules still need separate treatment.

Reuse records, preserve differencesRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Shared input

Keep one controlled source record for each measured activity.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

The honest case for sustainability software is that the same underlying data serves several regimes, and re-keying it for each is where errors enter.

The case only holds where the regimes ask for the same thing.

Location-based electricity emissions are the clearest overlap: SECR asks for purchased-electricity emissions, UK SRS S2 requires the location-based figure, and the revised ESRS require it too.

Market-based Scope 2 is the clearest divergence: the ESRS require it, while UK SRS S2 only permits it (¶¶B30–B31).

Energy in kilowatt-hours is required by SECR and by ESOS, but on different periods: SECR on the financial year, ESOS on a twelve-month reference period that may differ (ESOS reg 22(5)).

Intensity ratios diverge completely: SECR asks for at least one emissions ratio of your choosing (Sch 7 ¶20G), ESOS for an energy intensity ratio for each of four organisational purposes (reg 25C).

Carbon credits never reduce the gross inventory under UK SRS S2 (¶29(a)(i)), so a tool that nets them off has produced a figure no standard asks for.

Pick a data item in the panel to see what each regime asks of it, with the provision.

One data item · four regimes

SECRrequiredEmissions from purchased electricity (and heat, steam, cooling for quoted companies). No method is prescribed in the Schedule.Sch 7 ¶15(3); ¶20D(2) ↗
UK SRS S2requiredLocation-based Scope 2 is required.UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(v); ¶B30 ↗
ESRSrequiredGross location-based Scope 2.ESRS E1-8 (revised) ↗
ESOSnot askedElectricity counts in kWh toward total energy consumption.SI 2014/1643 reg 25 ↗

The one figure all three emissions regimes can share.

ESRS rows apply only where the CSRD reaches you.

Nothing you select leaves your browser.

What vendors publish

How much does sustainability software cost? Only what each vendor publishes

The directory records vendor-published pricing and does not invent estimates for products that require a quote.

Only published vendor prices

Published figure

Retain the vendor's currency and stated basis.

Free entry

Distinguish a free start from the scope of paid products.

Quote required

Check users, modules, entities and implementation separately.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Two vendors in the directory publish a paid figure: Microsoft and Salesforce.

2 vendors say they offer a free plan or start; where paid prices are not published on the page read, the entry says so.

“Enterprise level · TBD” means the vendor publishes no price and asks you to request a quotation, and Seedling’s paid prices are to be confirmed.

Prices in different currencies are not converted, and nothing here is a quotation.

The directory

Seventeen vendors, in alphabetical order, in their own words

Each directory entry describes the vendor's own published material and does not establish product performance.

Claims, not assessmentsRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Framework names

A named framework is a published claim.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence
Read 1 October 2026 from each vendor’s own site. Alphabetical; the order means nothing. “Enterprise level · TBD” means the vendor publishes no price.
Vendor · price · linksWhat it says it doesFrameworks named on its site
Climatise
Enterprise level · TBD
Climatise profile · site ↗
Carbon accounting software built around file upload: invoices, spreadsheets and energy data in, Scope 1, 2 and 3 calculated, reports generated with methodology notes, plus an ESOS Phase 4 workflow.SECR, ESOS, UK SRS, CSRD, ISSB
Cority
Enterprise level · TBD
Cority profile · site ↗
An environment, health and safety platform that includes sustainability reporting alongside occupational health, incident reporting and compliance audits.CDP, GRI, SASB, TCFD, CSRD, ISSB
Emitwise
Not sold as a standalone product
Emitwise profile · site ↗
The Emitwise platform now sits inside Green Project Technologies’ supply-chain and product carbon footprint offering.
Acquired by Green Project Technologies in July 2025; the company says Emitwise “is no longer sold as a standalone product or brand”.
None named on the page read
Greenly
Enterprise level · TBD (plans listed, no figures published)
Greenly profile · site ↗
A climate platform with modules for GHG assessment, life-cycle assessment, ESG management, CSRD reporting and EU CBAM declarations, and an AI assistant it calls EcoPilot.
Greenly and Normative announced a merger in September 2026.
GHG Protocol, CSRD, ESRS, VSME, CBAM, CDP, ISSB, SBTi
IBM Envizi
Enterprise level · TBD (priced by data volume in three Account bundles; no figures published)
IBM Envizi profile · site ↗
ESG data management from IBM: Scope 1, 2 and 3 accounting on the GHG Protocol, financed emissions, supply-chain data and multi-framework reporting.GHG Protocol, ESRS, CSRD, GRI, SASB, TCFD
Microsoft Sustainability Manager
US$4,000 (Essentials) or US$12,000 (Premium) per tenant, per month, as published by Microsoft
Microsoft Sustainability Manager profile · site ↗
Microsoft’s sustainability products, led by Sustainability Manager and sustainability data solutions in Microsoft Fabric, for recording, reporting and reducing environmental impact.CSRD, ISSB, GRI, SASB
Normative
Enterprise level · TBD (both packages are “get a quote”)
Normative profile · site ↗
Carbon accounting for Scope 1, 2 and 3 on its own implementation of the GHG Protocol standards, with a named climate adviser on each account and an Essential and a Premium package.
Normative and Greenly announced a merger in September 2026.
GHG Protocol, CSRD, CDP, SBTi
Persefoni
Pro plan free; Advanced Enterprise level · TBD
Persefoni profile · site ↗
Carbon footprint and sustainability reporting software with plans from a free sign-up upwards, regulatory and investor reporting, and financed-emissions tools for financial services.SECR, CDP, ISSB, CSRD, GHG Protocol
Plan A
Enterprise level · TBD
Plan A profile · site ↗
Carbon accounting, carbon reporting and decarbonisation planning in one platform, with calculation methods it says are maintained by its scientific staff.
Diginex announced on 14 January 2026 that it had closed its acquisition of Plan A.
GHG Protocol, CSRD, ESRS
Salesforce Net Zero Cloud
£168,000 per org per year (Net Zero Cloud Growth, billed annually), as published by Salesforce
Salesforce Net Zero Cloud profile · site ↗
Salesforce’s ESG software: carbon conversion of energy and travel data, what-if forecasting, and report builders with drafting by its Agentforce assistant.CSRD, SASB, GRI, CDP, GHG Protocol
Sami
Enterprise level · TBD
Sami profile · site ↗
A carbon hub and an ESG hub: data collection, an emission-factor database, action plans, and ESRS-based double materiality with CSRD and VSME report support.
SGS announced the acquisition of a majority stake in Sami on 21 November 2025.
ESRS, CSRD, VSME
Seedling
Enterprise level · TBD (a free start is offered; paid prices not published on the page read)
Seedling profile · site ↗
Carbon management software paired with a dedicated carbon specialist, measuring Scope 1, 2 and 3 and producing compliance reports.SECR, GHG Protocol, ISO 14064, SBTi
SINAI
Enterprise level · TBD
SINAI profile · site ↗
Enterprise carbon management that joins Scope 1–3 accounting to decarbonisation planning: marginal abatement cost curves, scenario modelling and carbon-price sensitivity.CSRD, CBAM, ISSB, CDP, GRI, SBTi, California SB 253 / SB 261
Sphera
Enterprise level · TBD
Sphera profile · site ↗
Operational risk, safety and sustainability software; its corporate sustainability product covers disclosure, emissions calculation, financed emissions and performance tracking, beside life-cycle assessment tools.None named on the page read
Sweep
Enterprise level · TBD
Sweep profile · site ↗
Sustainability data management that maps one dataset to many frameworks, with supplier portals, version history on every figure and an auditor access interface.CSRD, ISSB, UK SRS, GRI, CDP, SASB, TCFD, California SB 253 / SB 261
Watershed
Enterprise level · TBD
Watershed profile · site ↗
An enterprise platform for emissions measurement and disclosure: data ingestion, methodologies for all 15 Scope 3 categories, report authoring and target tracking.CSRD, ESRS, CDP, TCFD, ISSB
Workiva
Enterprise level · TBD (pricing by consultation; the vendor says every offering carries unlimited seats)
Workiva profile · site ↗
A reporting platform that connects carbon and financial data, with Workiva Carbon for Scope 1–3 calculation and its CSRD solution for double materiality and ESRS disclosure.CSRD, ESRS, ISSB, GRI, CDP, California SB 253 / SB 261

Filter by a framework the vendor names · 17 of 17

  1. ClimatiseNames: SECR · ESOS · UK SRS · CSRD · ISSB · Price: Enterprise level · TBD
  2. CorityNames: CDP · GRI · SASB · TCFD · CSRD · ISSB · Price: Enterprise level · TBD
  3. EmitwiseNames: no framework on the page read · Price: Not sold as a standalone productAcquired by Green Project Technologies in July 2025; the company says Emitwise “is no longer sold as a standalone product or brand”.
  4. GreenlyNames: GHG Protocol · CSRD · ESRS · VSME · CBAM · CDP · ISSB · SBTi · Price: Enterprise level · TBD (plans listed, no figures published)Greenly and Normative announced a merger in September 2026.
  5. IBM EnviziNames: GHG Protocol · ESRS · CSRD · GRI · SASB · TCFD · Price: Enterprise level · TBD (priced by data volume in three Account bundles; no figures published)
  6. Microsoft Sustainability ManagerNames: CSRD · ISSB · GRI · SASB · Price: US$4,000 (Essentials) or US$12,000 (Premium) per tenant, per month, as published by Microsoft
  7. NormativeNames: GHG Protocol · CSRD · CDP · SBTi · Price: Enterprise level · TBD (both packages are “get a quote”)Normative and Greenly announced a merger in September 2026.
  8. PersefoniNames: SECR · CDP · ISSB · CSRD · GHG Protocol · Price: Pro plan free; Advanced Enterprise level · TBD
  9. Plan ANames: GHG Protocol · CSRD · ESRS · Price: Enterprise level · TBDDiginex announced on 14 January 2026 that it had closed its acquisition of Plan A.
  10. Salesforce Net Zero CloudNames: CSRD · SASB · GRI · CDP · GHG Protocol · Price: £168,000 per org per year (Net Zero Cloud Growth, billed annually), as published by Salesforce
  11. SamiNames: ESRS · CSRD · VSME · Price: Enterprise level · TBDSGS announced the acquisition of a majority stake in Sami on 21 November 2025.
  12. SeedlingNames: SECR · GHG Protocol · ISO 14064 · SBTi · Price: Enterprise level · TBD (a free start is offered; paid prices not published on the page read)
  13. SINAINames: CSRD · CBAM · ISSB · CDP · GRI · SBTi · California SB 253 / SB 261 · Price: Enterprise level · TBD
  14. SpheraNames: no framework on the page read · Price: Enterprise level · TBD
  15. SweepNames: CSRD · ISSB · UK SRS · GRI · CDP · SASB · TCFD · California SB 253 / SB 261 · Price: Enterprise level · TBD
  16. WatershedNames: CSRD · ESRS · CDP · TCFD · ISSB · Price: Enterprise level · TBD
  17. WorkivaNames: CSRD · ESRS · ISSB · GRI · CDP · California SB 253 / SB 261 · Price: Enterprise level · TBD (pricing by consultation; the vendor says every offering carries unlimited seats)

Each line lists what the vendor’s own site named, read on 1 October 2026; the descriptions are in the table.

Alphabetical; the order means nothing.

Nothing you select leaves your browser.

Use the filter to see which vendors name a framework you report under.

Then treat that as the start of a question, not the answer to one.

A vendor naming UK SRS on its website tells you it intends to serve UK SRS reporters; it does not tell you whether the tool records location-based Scope 2 by default or keeps a relief statement for Scope 3.

The demonstration requests in the requirements register above, and the question builder on the carbon management software page, are how you turn a website claim into something you have seen.

Three corporate events change what some entries mean.

Emitwise’s platform was acquired by Green Project Technologies in July 2025 and, in the company’s words on emitwise.com, is no longer sold as a standalone product.

Normative and Greenly announced a merger in September 2026, in a joint announcement that says the combined group will support 4,000 customers across more than 30 countries.

SGS announced the acquisition of a majority stake in Sami on 21 November 2025.

Architecture

Three ways a sustainability platform is built, and what you inherit

A carbon calculator, reporting platform and data-management tool can look similar while starting from different jobs.

Origins can shape the workflow

Calculation-led

Focus on emissions inputs and factors.

Reporting-led

Focus on disclosures and narrative review.

Data-led

Focus on collection, integrations and controls.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

These began as emissions calculators and grew outwards into reporting.

Among the vendors in the directory, Normative, Greenly, Seedling, Plan A, Climatise, Persefoni and Watershed describe their products primarily in emissions-accounting terms.

What you inherit is a calculation engine designed around the GHG Protocol, which is the right starting point for SECR and UK SRS S2 metrics.

What you should check is how the narrative and materiality parts of UK SRS S1 are handled, because they were added later.

The remaining profiles, SINAI and Emitwise, are covered on their own pages; SINAI describes decarbonisation planning joined to accounting, and Emitwise is no longer sold as a product.

If you would rather buy expertise than a tool, the sustainability consultancy page covers that route, and for the SECR end of the market specifically a separate reference on SECR reporting software tests tools against Schedule 7.

The labels on the box

“IFRS-compliant” and “TCFD” software: what the labels can and cannot mean

A product’s framework support does not establish that an entity’s disclosures satisfy the standard.

Understand IFRS S1 and S2

A logo is not complianceRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Coverage

Ask which specific paragraphs the product supports.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Two of the most searched phrases for this category are “IFRS-compliant sustainability software” and “TCFD reporting software for UK listed companies”.

Both labels promise more than any product can deliver on its own.

Compliance with IFRS S1 and S2, or with UK SRS, is a statement an entity makes about its own disclosures; UK SRS S1 ¶73A says an entity using the climate-first provision in ¶E3 is not permitted to assert compliance with UK SRS S1 at all.

No software can make that statement true or false; only what the entity discloses can.

What a tool can do is hold the data behind the seven cross-industry metric categories in IFRS S2 ¶29 — gross emissions, transition and physical risk, opportunities, capital deployment, internal carbon prices and remuneration — and structure the four-pillar disclosure around them.

The TCFD label has a different problem: the Task Force disbanded in 2023, and the FCA says its new rules replace the TCFD-aligned disclosures for listed companies (PS26/19 ¶1.10).

A UK listed company buying “TCFD software” in 2026 is buying for a regime that ends with accounting periods beginning before 1 January 2027.

How the two frameworks line up is on UK SRS against TCFD, and the four pillars themselves on the four pillars of sustainability reporting.

The same reading applies to IFRS S1 and S2 on their own terms: see IFRS S1, IFRS S2 and the standard-setter at the ISSB.

Sources: UK SRS S1 ¶73A; FCA PS26/19 ¶1.10; DR (EU) 2026/1563; ISSB; GRI Standards.

The audit trail

Assurance: what the software has to let someone check

Software can organise evidence for assurance, while the assurance conclusion belongs to the independent engagement.

Show the reviewer the trailRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Trace

Connect the published figure to its calculation and source record.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

UK SRS and the FCA listing rules do not impose a general duty to obtain assurance over sustainability disclosures.

What the FCA rules require of listed companies in scope is a statement: whether third-party assurance was obtained and, if so, the provider, which disclosures, the level and the standards used (UKLR 6.6.6R(8)(d)).

Where assurance is obtained, the FRC’s ISSA (UK) 5000 is available for engagements over periods beginning on or after 15 December 2026, for providers who choose it.

For software the practical consequence is the same whichever standard an assurer uses: a sample figure has to be traceable from the reported total back to the source document, the factor and the calculation.

The CSRD goes further, because its limited-assurance opinion also covers the process used to identify what is reported — so for an EU reporter the materiality record must be kept in auditable form (Directive 2013/34/EU Art 34(1)).

The UK side is set out on UK SRS assurance, and how the reporting itself is put together on the UK SRS reporting guidance page.

For a whole-programme view of what a listed company must now do, the UK SRS compliance page follows the FCA rules limb by limb, and the UK SRS S1 page the general requirements.

A company planning its first UK SRS report can also see the paired standards and their dates on UK SRS S1 and S2.

The market

The sustainability software market in 2026, in its owners’ own words

Commercial market reports and vendor positioning do not substitute for a product demonstration or public-body market estimate.

Analyst reports are their own evidence

Forecast

Identify who owns the estimate and methodology.

Directory

Read published vendor features separately.

Selection

Use requirements and demonstrated evidence for procurement.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

We do not publish a market-size figure, because none is owned by a public body and the commercial estimates disagree.

A study such as the ESG reporting software market report from MarketsandMarkets is a paid forecast, and its number is its own.

What can be stated is what the analyst firms say about their own reports.

Verdantix’s Green Quadrant for enterprise carbon management software, dated 11 March 2026, benchmarks 21 providers across 12 capability and nine momentum categories.

Its press release names eight firms in its leading group: Cority, IBM, Schneider Electric, Sphera, Sweep, UL Solutions, Watershed and Wolters Kluwer.

That is Verdantix’s assessment, made with its own method, and not ours.

Forrester’s Wave for sustainability management software is from the second quarter of 2024, evaluates 13 providers against 24 criteria, and is roughly two years older than the Verdantix report.

The demand side is clearer in CDP’s own figures: in 2025 its supply-chain members requested environmental data from nearly 45,000 companies in 110 countries (CDP, Sustainable Supply Chains, 18 March 2026).

That is why supplier data collection appears in so many products, and why the CSRD’s value-chain cap — explained on the CSRD reporting software page — matters to anyone configuring a supplier portal.

21
vendors in Verdantix’s 2026 carbon management Green Quadrant
13
providers in the Forrester Wave, Q2 2024
45,000
companies CDP supply-chain members requested data from in 2025 (“nearly”)

Method

How to use this page, and what it does not do

Use the same reporting brief and data exercise for every shortlisted product.

  1. 1

    Scope

    Agree the reporting outputs and responsibilities.

  2. 2

    Demonstrate

    Test source-to-disclosure behaviour with a sample record.

  3. 3

    Contract

    Specify exports, implementation and ongoing ownership.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Start with the regimes you report under, not with a vendor list.

Filter the requirements register to those regimes and take the demonstration requests into every vendor meeting.

Ask to see each one on your own data, and note which were shown and which were only described.

Use the directory to find vendors who say they serve your frameworks, then read their own pages rather than anyone’s summary of them, ours included.

Where a vendor’s own site publishes no price, we record that as “Enterprise level · TBD” rather than guessing; Microsoft and Salesforce are the two whose pages carried a paid price on 1 October 2026.

If you want to talk the requirements through with someone, you can book a free 15-minute call; the call is about the rules, not about which product to buy.

Why no ranking

Ranking a product honestly means testing it, and this site has not tested these products.

A list ordered without testing is an opinion presented as a finding, which is the thing this page is written to help you see through.

0/6
Running a vendor demonstration
Tick a step when it is done. Nothing is saved or sent.
List the regimes you report under

Use the decision tree above.

Everything else follows from this list, not from a vendor shortlist.

What this page does not do

  • Rank, score or recommend any product
  • State a price a vendor does not publish
  • Repeat a vendor’s own awards or certifications
  • Take fees, affiliate commission or briefings

Beyond the rules

Security, data protection and verification: three questions that are not about emissions

A security or certification claim must identify the product, organisation and scope it actually covers.

  1. 1

    Identity

    Identify the contracting entity and service.

  2. 2

    Evidence

    Read the certificate or independent assurance report.

  3. 3

    Scope

    Check coverage, dates, exclusions and customer responsibilities.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

A sustainability platform holds commercial data, some of it personal, and its output may be verified by a third party.

None of the questions below is a requirement of UK SRS, SECR or ESOS, and this site tests none of the products; they are questions a buyer can put to any vendor.

How is the data protected? ISO/IEC 27001 is the international standard for information security management systems, and the NCSC’s Cyber Essentials is the government-backed baseline scheme for UK organisations.

Ask whether the vendor holds either, and ask to see the certificate rather than rely on a badge on a web page.

Does the data include personal data? Commuting, travel and supplier-contact records can, and the ICO’s UK GDPR guidance is where the duties sit.

Who verifies the result? ISO 14064-3 specifies the verification of a greenhouse gas statement, and UKAS is the UK’s national accreditation body, so a certificate from a verifier can be checked against who accredits it.

We do not repeat any vendor’s own security or assurance badges; each is the vendor’s claim, and the certificate is the evidence.

Sources: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO 14064-3:2019 (ISO); Cyber Essentials (NCSC); UK GDPR guidance (ICO); UKAS.

Further reading from the authorities

Where to read the rules yourself

The specialist guides explain the standards, inventories and support models behind a software brief.

Follow the next reporting need

Inventory

Read the GHG Protocol and carbon software guides.

Standards

Read UK SRS and IFRS disclosure requirements.

Support

Compare consultancy and internal ownership.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

Software guides

For the year behind the report, see sustainability management software.

For the record underneath every figure, see sustainability data management software.

For the published output, see ESG disclosure software and climate disclosure software.

For carbon and targets managed in-year, see emissions management software and net zero management software.

Frequently asked

Questions people ask

What is sustainability software?

Sustainability software collects environmental, social and governance data, calculates the metrics that depend on it — greenhouse gas emissions first among them — and turns the results into a disclosure against a framework such as UK SRS, the ESRS, GRI or CDP.

Carbon accounting software is the part of the category that stops at the emissions inventory; sustainability software carries the data on into materiality, governance and narrative disclosure.

What is sustainability reporting software?

It is the reporting layer of sustainability software: the part that maps collected data to the disclosure requirements of a named framework and produces the text and tables that are published.

The terms sustainability reporting software, sustainability disclosure software and ESG reporting software are used for the same class of tool in the UK market.

What is the best sustainability reporting software in the UK?

This site does not name one, because it has not tested any of the products and a ranking without testing is an opinion presented as a finding.

The useful question is which tool can demonstrate, on your own data, the specific things the rules you report under require — location-based Scope 2 for UK SRS S2, a chosen intensity ratio for SECR, the 95% line for ESOS, the version statement for the ESRS in 2026. This page lists those requirements with their provisions.

Is there IFRS-compliant sustainability software?

Compliance with IFRS S1 and S2, or with UK SRS, is asserted by the entity about its own disclosures, not by a software vendor about a product.

UK SRS S1 ¶73A even sets out when an entity may not assert compliance.

Software can hold the data and structure the disclosure; whether the report complies depends on what the entity discloses.

Is UK SRS mandatory for listed companies?

Not in the sense of a flat duty.

The FCA’s final rules (PS26/19, 30 September 2026) require listed companies in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22 to report against UK SRS on a comply-or-explain basis for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, with first reports in 2028.

For every other UK entity the standards are available for voluntary use.

What software supports CSRD and TCFD reporting?

Many vendors say they map one dataset to the ESRS and to TCFD-aligned or ISSB-aligned disclosure; the directory on this page records which frameworks each vendor names on its own site.

Note that the TCFD disbanded in 2023, and the FCA’s new rules replace the TCFD-aligned listing-rule disclosures from 2027.

Do I need separate carbon and sustainability software?

Not necessarily.

A company whose only duties are SECR and ESOS needs an energy and emissions record; a company reporting against UK SRS S1 and S2 or the ESRS also needs materiality records, governance and strategy narrative, and a disclosure workflow.

Some vendors sell both in one product, others sell the carbon part alone.

Does sustainability software need to be assured?

UK SRS and the FCA listing rules do not impose a general duty to obtain sustainability assurance.

Listed companies in scope of the FCA rules must say whether they obtained assurance and, if so, from whom, over which disclosures and to which standard.

Where an assurer is engaged, the practical test for software is whether a reported figure can be traced back to its source document and calculation.

Which software helps meet IFRS sustainability metrics?

The cross-industry metrics in IFRS S2 ¶29 run from gross Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions to internal carbon prices and remuneration.

A tool that only calculates emissions covers the first of seven categories; ask a vendor to show where each of the other six would be recorded.

What is the difference between ESG software and sustainability software?

None that any instrument defines.

ESG software is the investor-facing name and sustainability software the umbrella term; both describe tools that collect environmental, social and governance data and map it to a framework.

What differs is the scope of a given product, which is why this page lists the outputs the rules require instead of comparing labels.

Is GRI still relevant if I report under UK SRS?

GRI describes its standards as helping organisations understand their impacts and respond to information demands from stakeholders and regulators, which is an impact lens.

UK SRS and the ISSB standards are written for investors.

They answer different questions, so a tool naming GRI is serving a second disclosure, not a replacement for UK SRS; the directory records which frameworks each vendor names.

What changed in 2026 for sustainability reporting software?

Five things moved.

DBT published UK SRS S1 and S2 on 25 February 2026.

DESNZ published conversion factors with a new electricity method on 11 June 2026.

The FCA issued PS26/19 on 30 September 2026.

The revised ESRS were adopted on 3 July 2026 and apply to financial years from 1 January 2027.

And DESNZ’s SECR review of 26 May 2026 recommended keeping SECR, with a streamlining consultation planned but not yet opened.

How much does sustainability software cost?

This site does not estimate prices.

Of the 17 vendors in the directory, 3 publish a price on the page we read, stated as the vendor states it and dated 1 October 2026; the rest show “Enterprise level · TBD”, meaning the vendor publishes none and asks you to request a quote or demonstration.

How do I choose sustainability software?

Start from the regimes you report under, not from a vendor list.

Filter the requirements register to those regimes, take each demonstration request into every vendor meeting, ask to see it on your own data, and record whether it was shown, described only, or not yet asked.

Then read each vendor’s own pages, not anyone’s summary of them, ours included.

What is the best ESG reporting software?

This site does not name one, because it has tested none of the products and a ranking without testing is an opinion presented as a finding.

The directory on this page lists 17 vendors alphabetically from their own sites, and the requirements register says what any tool must show you on your own data.

Is ESG better than CSR?

Neither term is defined in any instrument cited on this page, so neither is better in law.

ESG is the investor-facing shorthand for environmental, social and governance data, and CSR is the older company-facing term for responsibility programmes; software sold under either name should be judged on the outputs it produces.

Is ESG still relevant in 2026?

For reporting software, yes: UK SRS S1 and S2 were published on 25 February 2026, the FCA made its comply-or-explain rules on 30 September 2026, and the revised ESRS apply from financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027.

What has changed is the vocabulary, which now follows the standards rather than the ESG label.

What sustainability software suits a small business?

A company that does not exceed at least two of £36m turnover, £18m balance sheet and 250 employees is outside the SECR tests for unquoted companies, so a small business often needs only an inventory of energy, fuel and travel with a named factor set.

Customers may still ask for data, and CDP says its supply-chain members requested environmental data from nearly 45,000 companies in 2025.

Which life cycle assessment platforms are audit-ready?

No standard defines an audit-ready platform.

ISO 14040 sets the principles and framework for life cycle assessment and ISO 14044 the requirements, including reporting and critical review, so the useful question is whether a tool produces each phase those standards name and lets a reviewer trace the figures.

Is there software for supplier carbon data and social audits?

Yes, in two separate groups.

Supplier data collection appears in many sustainability platforms and answers customer requests such as CDP questionnaires, while social audits such as SMETA are carried out by an approved auditor and the results can then be recorded in a platform.

What is environmental reporting software?

It is the part of sustainability software that holds energy, fuel, travel and waste records, applies a named conversion-factor set, and produces the environmental statements the rules ask for, such as the SECR limbs and the UK SRS S2 emissions disclosures.

The DESNZ factor set must match the year of the activity data.

Editorial example

Ask for a demonstration, not a logo

Use a fictional electricity record to test what the system does when a unit, factor or reporting period changes.

  1. 1

    Import

    Load a kWh record with its invoice and reporting date.

  2. 2

    Correct

    Change an error and inspect the version history.

  3. 3

    Export

    Reproduce the approved figure and its evidence in an independent file.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

This is a suggested procurement exercise using fictional data, not a product assessment.

Handover

Buy a reporting process you can retain

A buying decision should include how the organisation retains usable data when a contract or vendor changes.

Compare consultancy and internal ownership

Keep control of the reporting recordRequirements and evidence

Module 01 / 03

Ownership

Specify access to activity data, calculations and narrative.

Read the detailed guidance and evidence

These questions are editorial procurement advice rather than a statutory software specification.

Prepare the evidence

Sustainability software: from a requirement to a reporting pack

Use this preparation sequence alongside the detailed requirements on this page.

An editorial workflow, not a statutory schedule.

  1. Stage 0101

    Reporting specification

    Write the reporting boundaries and required outputs before evaluating a platform.

  2. Stage 0202

    Evidence sample

    Ask the vendor to demonstrate a representative import and calculation.

  3. Stage 0303

    Method control

    Inspect factor versions, estimates, permissions and change history.

  4. Stage 0404

    Reporting export

    Test the export against the required disclosures and existing reporting systems.

  5. Stage 0505

    Review trail

    Check whether a reviewer can follow a result back to its source record.

  6. Stage 0606

    Commercial record

    Record only the features, scope and prices the vendor actually commits to.

Read the applicable instrument: SMETA Audit: the global standard for social audits

A practical brief

An evidence pack, with a clear review trail

Ask for a pack that lets the next reviewer retrace the scope decision, follow the evidence and understand the limitations.

This describes a useful handover; it does not certify compliance or establish that a vendor or adviser delivers it.

Trace the answerScope → evidence → review

Module 01 / 04

Applicability record

Write down the entity, reporting route and relevant period, including why the route applies.

View the preparation diagramSustainability software: evidence preparation sequenceSustainability software: evidence preparation sequence
  1. Prepare01

    Create the traceable pack

    Keep the input records, calculation files and narrative together.

  2. Challenge02

    Resolve questions before publication

    Record the assumptions challenged and any limitations still unresolved.

  3. Retain03

    Make the next cycle reproducible

    Keep the approved version and the actions carried forward.

Sources

Primary sources

Every figure, date and status on this page traces to the instrument’s owner.

Secondary commentary is never the source for a number.

Checked against 45 sources fromSedexISODepartment for Business and TradeFinancial Conduct Authoritylegislation.gov.ukDepartment for Energy Security and Net Zero
  1. Sedex
    SMETA Audit: the global standard for social audits

    Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit, created and stewarded by Sedex; delivered by an approved auditor company.

  2. ISO
    ISO 14040:2006 Life cycle assessment — principles and framework

    Last reviewed and confirmed in 2022.

  3. ISO
    ISO 14044:2006 Life cycle assessment — requirements and guidelines

    Last reviewed and confirmed in 2022.

  4. Department for Business and Trade
    UK Sustainability Reporting Standards: UK SRS S1 and UK SRS S2 (25 February 2026)

    Publication of both standards by DBT.

  5. Department for Business and Trade
    UK Sustainability Reporting Standards — guidance

    That the standards are available for voluntary use by any entity.

  6. Department for Business and Trade
    UK SRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures, ¶29(a) and ¶¶B30–B33

    Gross emissions, the GHG Protocol, location-based Scope 2, the fifteen Scope 3 categories.

  7. Department for Business and Trade
    UK SRS S1 General Requirements, ¶73A and Appendix E

    Who may assert compliance, and the climate-first provision.

  8. Financial Conduct Authority
    PS26/19: Aligning listed issuers’ sustainability disclosures with international standards (30 September 2026)

    Comply or explain across UK SRS; scope; the reliefs; replacement of the TCFD-aligned rules (¶1.10).

  9. Financial Conduct Authority
    PS26/19, Appendix 1 — UKLR 6.6.6R(7A), (7B) and (8)

    The explanation, location, assurance and transition-plan statements.

  10. Financial Conduct Authority
    CP26/5 — the consultation PS26/19 finalises

    Cited as the consultation only; its proposals were changed by the final rules.

  11. legislation.gov.uk
    SI 2008/410 Schedule 7, Parts 7 and 7A — SECR

    Energy, emissions, intensity ratio, methodology and comparatives.

  12. legislation.gov.uk
    ESOS Regulations 2014, regulation 25

    Total energy consumption and the 95% significant-consumption line.

  13. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
    Government conversion factors for company reporting

    The factor sets a UK tool applies.

  14. Financial Reporting Council
    ISSA (UK) 5000 (issued 12 November 2025)

    Effective for periods from 15 December 2026, for providers who choose it.

  15. IFRS Foundation
    IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 issued (26 June 2023)

    The international baseline UK SRS adopts.

  16. European Commission
    Commission adopts revised sustainability reporting standards (3 July 2026)

    The Commission’s own account of the datapoint reduction.

  17. EUR-Lex
    Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563 — the revised ESRS

    In force 10 November 2026; applies to financial years from 1 January 2027; three FY2026 options.

  18. Verdantix
    Green Quadrant: Enterprise Carbon Management Software (2026)

    An analyst report, cited only for its own scope and the vendors it names.

  19. Forrester Research
    The Forrester Wave™: Sustainability Management Software, Q2 2024

    An analyst report, cited for its own scope and date only.

  20. CDP
    Sustainable Supply Chains (18 March 2026)

    CDP’s own figures for supply-chain data requests.

  21. MarketsandMarkets
    ESG Reporting Software Market report

    A commercial market study; linked for reference, no figure from it is repeated here.

  22. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
    2026 post-implementation review of the SECR Regulations 2018 (26 May 2026)

    Retain SECR with amendments; a streamlining consultation planned but not opened.

  23. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
    Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors 2026

    The 2026 factor set, for activity data falling mostly in 2026.

  24. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
    2026 conversion factors methodology paper ¶¶1.10, 1.13

    The factor-year rule and the new electricity method.

  25. legislation.gov.uk
    SI 2026/701 — the ESOS amendment Regulations

    The 2026 amendments for ESOS Phase 4.

  26. GOV.UK
    ESOS Phase 4: how to comply

    The government’s own compliance guidance for Phase 4.

  27. GHG Protocol
    Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard

    The measurement basis UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(ii) names.

  28. GHG Protocol
    Scope 2 Guidance

    Location-based and market-based methods.

  29. GHG Protocol
    Standards index

    The family of standards a carbon-accounting tool implements.

  30. GHG Protocol
    Consolidated Corporate Standard — Standard Development Plan v2.0 (29 July 2026), §9

    Consolidated draft estimated Q2 2027; revised standard estimated Q4 2028; subject to change.

  31. ISO
    ISO 14064-1:2018 — organisation-level GHG quantification

    The international inventory standard.

  32. ISO
    ISO 14064-3:2019 — verification and validation of GHG statements

    The standard for verifying a GHG statement.

  33. ISO / IEC
    ISO/IEC 27001:2022 — information security management systems

    A question to put to any vendor about how data is protected.

  34. National Cyber Security Centre
    Cyber Essentials

    The government-backed baseline cyber-security scheme.

  35. Information Commissioner’s Office
    UK GDPR guidance and resources

    For the personal data some activity records contain.

  36. UKAS
    UK Accreditation Service

    The national accreditation body, for checking who accredits a certifier.

  37. IFRS Foundation
    International Sustainability Standards Board

    The standard-setter behind IFRS S1 and S2.

  38. IFRS Foundation
    IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards navigator

    IFRS S1 and S2 in full.

  39. Global Reporting Initiative
    GRI Standards

    The impact-reporting standards many tools also name.

  40. EFRAG
    Sustainability reporting

    The technical adviser behind the ESRS.

  41. CDP
    Question bank and guidance

    The 2026 questionnaires and scoring methodologies.

  42. Science Based Targets initiative
    Standards and guidance

    The target-setting standards some tools build in.

  43. Financial Reporting Council
    Assurance standards

    Where ISSA (UK) 5000 sits.

  44. IAASB
    ISSA 5000

    The international standard ISSA (UK) 5000 is based on.

  45. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
    UK greenhouse gas emissions statistics

    The official national series the corporate inventories sit beside.

Book a free consultation